Picture this: It's Monday morning, and your team is scrambling to prepare the monthly performance report for council. Sarah from Finance is copying and pasting numbers from three different spreadsheets. Mike from IT is trying to figure out why the pivot table broke again. The report that should take an hour stretches into a full day of manual labor. And you're wondering why, in 2025, creating a simple dashboard feels like defusing a bomb.
If this sounds familiar, you're not alone. Across governments, smart people are trapped in what we call "spreadsheet prison"—spending 60-80% of their time wrestling with data instead of actually using it to make decisions. Your analysts become data janitors. Your leadership team makes decisions based on week-old information. Your public reporting lacks the transparency and accessibility that citizens expect.
This isn't just a productivity problem—it's a strategic capability gap that undermines your ability to serve citizens effectively.
The good news? There's a way out. The bad news? The most obvious escape route might just lead to another, more expensive prison.
When government teams start looking beyond Excel, Microsoft Power BI seems like the natural choice. After all, you're already paying for Microsoft licenses, so Power BI comes "free" with your E3 subscription, right?
Here's where things get interesting—and expensive. Power BI is only free until you try to share anything, which is literally the whole point of having reports in the first place.
Let's break down what happens when you actually try to use Power BI:
Suddenly, that "free" tool is costing your department hundreds or thousands every month. For larger organizations, we're talking about serious budget impact.
And Microsoft knows exactly what they're doing. This is the classic sunk cost trap: once you've invested weeks building reports and training staff, switching feels impossible.
Sometimes, organizations decide enough is enough. Take Schleswig-Holstein, a German state that recently made international headlines by ditching Microsoft entirely. Their IT minister didn't mince words: "We're done with Teams."
Why such a dramatic move? Hidden costs, forced upgrades, and vendor lock-in that left them feeling "taken by the throat." They expect to save tens of millions of euros by switching to open-source alternatives.
This highlights critical questions every government leader should ask: Are you choosing tools that serve your mission, or are you just paying whatever the vendor demands?
Here's what many organizations get wrong: they focus on building reports instead of sharing insights. But the whole point of business intelligence is communication. A dashboard that only one person can see is just a fancy spreadsheet.
Modern BI tools should integrate seamlessly with your existing workflow, not create another system your staff has to remember to check. The best solutions embed directly into tools your team already uses daily.
Power BI does excel here, working smoothly within PowerPoint presentations and Teams channels. This provides visibility right where people are already working, which dramatically improves adoption rates.
Citizens increasingly expect government data to be accessible and transparent. This isn't just nice-to-have—it's becoming a fundamental expectation of modern governance.
The most effective public dashboards embed directly into existing government websites, keeping citizens on your platform while providing dynamic, up-to-date information. This transforms static PDF reports that nobody reads into engaging, interactive experiences that build trust and understanding.
Key requirements include:
Let's be brutally honest about Power BI's strengths and weaknesses, because understanding these details can save you months of frustration.
Accessibility Challenges: Power BI has known limitations when it comes to meeting government accessibility standards. Screen readers struggle with complex visualizations, keyboard navigation is inconsistent, and color schemes often fail contrast requirements.
The Two-Platform Problem: Power BI splits functionality between Desktop (Windows-only) and Service (browser-based), creating operational nightmares. Features available in Desktop often don't work in Service, and vice versa. Files don't transfer cleanly between platforms, and version control is practically impossible.
User Experience Chaos: Most BI tools follow predictable design patterns. Power BI feels like it was designed by committee, with settings scattered across multiple locations and basic formatting requiring hunting through nested menus.
The Language Learning Requirement: To use Power BI effectively, you'll need to master DAX (Data Analysis Expressions) and M Language—both Microsoft-specific languages that don't transfer to other platforms.
When evaluating BI platforms, think beyond feature checklists and consider the total impact on your organization.
Before falling into vendor traps, evaluate your actual needs:
The sticker price is just the beginning. Calculate the real costs:
This isn't optional for government organizations—it's a legal requirement:
Evaluate how easily you can migrate if you need to change platforms:
The BI landscape includes numerous alternatives that might better serve your specific needs and constraints.
Some vendors specialize in public sector requirements, offering built-in compliance features, accessibility standards, and government-friendly pricing models.
Don't start with software selection. Start with strategy.
At Button, we've guided dozens of government organizations through BI platform evaluations. Our experience shows that context matters more than features. The "best" BI tool is the one that fits your team's skills, your budget constraints, and your specific use cases.
The organizations that succeed with BI transformation don't just buy tools—they build capabilities. They invest in their people, establish clear processes, and choose technology that enhances their team's abilities rather than requiring them to work around limitations.
If you're tired of fighting with spreadsheets but want to avoid expensive mistakes, start with strategy, not software shopping.
Ask yourself the fundamental questions: What decisions could you make better with real-time data? What manual processes are eating up your team's time and morale? What information could help you serve citizens more effectively?
Once you're clear on the "why," the "what" becomes much easier to figure out. You might discover that your needs are simpler than you thought, or more complex than you realized. Either way, you'll make a better decision.
Remember the lesson from Schleswig-Holstein: you don't have to accept vendor lock-in and escalating costs as inevitable. There are alternatives, but finding the right one requires strategic thinking, not just price comparison.
Ready to escape spreadsheet prison without falling into the vendor lock-in trap? Contact us at hello@button.is to start the conversation about your BI transformation.
Button helps government organizations make smarter digital decisions that improve services, reduce costs, and better serve citizens. We're available through multiple qualified supplier lists and procurement vehicles.
Our twice-monthly digital services newsletter. Get our best tips, insights and resources delivered straight to your inbox!
We love to have conversations with decision makers, technology leaders, and product managers from government and industry. If that sounds like you, and you have a digital project you’d like to let us know about, please fill out our contact form.
Our business development team will reach out promptly.